Blog

Coursehelp
January 4, 2019
QUESTION : No Comments

(Solved) : Discuss how important the planning phase is for the proje

Discuss how important the planning phase is for the project and identify 3 key outputs from that phase that would contribute to the success of a project

Expert Answer


Planning phase is an important phase of a project as it involves around the creation of a set of pla

OR
OR

Have a Comment on this Question?

Questions viewed by other students


  • QUESTION : (Solved) : 13 251 Exercise Explore Performance Trade Offs Three Processors Employ Different Types Mul Q30632508

    .13 251 <3.13> In this exercise, you will explore performance trade-offs between three processors that each employ different types of multithreading. Each of these processors is superscalar, uses in-order pipelines, requires a fixed three- cycle stall following all loads and branches, and has identical L1 caches. Instruc- issued in the same cycle are read in must not contain any data or control dependences. Processor A is a superscalar SMT architecture, capable of issuing up to two instructions per cycle from two threads. Processor B is a fine MT architecture, capable of issuing up to four instruc le thread and switches threads on any pipeline stall.

    .13 251 In this exercise, you will explore performance trade-offs between three processors that each employ different types of multithreading. Each of these processors is superscalar, uses in-order pipelines, requires a fixed three- cycle stall following all loads and branches, and has identical L1 caches. Instruc- issued in the same cycle are read in must not contain any data or control dependences. Processor A is a superscalar SMT architecture, capable of issuing up to two instructions per cycle from two threads. Processor B is a fine MT architecture, capable of issuing up to four instruc le thread and switches threads on any pipeline stall. Show transcribed image text .13 251 In this exercise, you will explore performance trade-offs between three processors that each employ different types of multithreading. Each of these processors is superscalar, uses in-order pipelines, requires a fixed three- cycle stall following all loads and branches, and has identical L1 caches. Instruc- issued in the same cycle are read in must not contain any data or control dependences. Processor A is a superscalar SMT architecture, capable of issuing up to two instructions per cycle from two threads. Processor B is a fine MT architecture, capable of issuing up to four instruc le thread and switches threads on any pipeline stall.

    Expert Answer


    Attached . . .


    view full answer
  • QUESTION : (Solved) : 129 S Mentioned Text Apparently Well Protected Network Could Brought Via Apparently Minor Q10157685

    1.29. A s we mentioned in the text, an apparently well-protected network could be brought down via an apparently minor trick. The following is a story shared by a reader of the first edition: I am a system administrator for a large company with employees worldwide. My site produces sensitive hardware and software products. We have a very strong network security team keeping our network safe. However, about 2 years ago (i.e., in 2012), espionage hackers still managed to get into our network. As secure as our network was, the hackers used Outlook Web Access (OWA) to get into our net- work, retrieving a large volume of data in 2 days. The attack took the following steps: 1. They first collected information form media and by calling the company disguised as a sales person or government authority. They managed to retrieve email addresses from local users who were assigned to my site. employees to other employees. 3. They would send emails with Trojans only during off hours, so that the email recipient would use OWA at home to access their email and bypass the firewalls and network security protocols at work. The email spoofing was being done for about 2 weeks until a employee replied to the hacker, thinking it was an employee from a company laptop off hours. When e to bypass the firewall and get into the network. We had to make major changes to the network the employee returned to the office the next day the hacker was abl rom top down including the following: I. Removed all oWA installations.(Ntwork Security)-subject(Ntwork Security)-subject1.29. A s we mentioned in the text, an apparently well-protected network could be brought down via an apparently minor trick. The following is a story shared by a reader of the first edition: “I am a system administrator for a large company with employees worldwide. My site produces sensitive hardware and software products. We have a very strong network security team keeping our network safe. However, about 2 years ago (i.e., in 2012), espionage hackers still managed to get into our network. As secure as our network was, the hackers used Outlook Web Access (OWA) to get into our net- work, retrieving a large volume of data in 2 days. The attack took the following steps: 1. They first collected information form media and by calling the company disguised as a sales person or government authority. They managed to retrieve email addresses from local users who were assigned to my site. employees to other employees. 3. They would send emails with Trojans only during off hours, so that the email recipient would use OWA at home to access their email and bypass the firewalls and network security protocols at work. The email spoofing was being done for about 2 weeks until a employee replied to the hacker, thinking it was an employee from a company laptop off hours. When e to bypass the firewall and get into the network. We had to make major changes to the network the employee returned to the office the next day the hacker was abl rom top down including the following: I. Removed all oWA installations. Show transcribed image text

    Expert Answer


    Attached . . .


    view full answer